Artemia tackles stereotypes and offers you an in-depth analysis in a multi-episode series. Stay tuned!
In our daily interactions with organizations striving to promote better gender diversity, and with women and men who wish to advance in their careers, the contradictions and misunderstandings we observe show that the path is far from easy.
At Artemia, our mission lies at the intersection of recruitment and diversity. Sometimes, we talk about "inclusive recruitment." But what does that actually mean? Some think it involves adding one or two women's CVs to a shortlist, while others see it as a passing trend. In reality, it’s much more than that, because diversity revolutionizes recruitment techniques. Wondering why? Let us explain.
The commitment of political parties to field an equal number of women and men in the federal elections had never been higher than this year: 45% of women on the electoral lists, totaling 595 women and 729 men. A record!
The access of women to positions of power within political, economic, and institutional realms is a true tightrope walk. Moving along the wire toward gender equality, with significant societal challenges on one side and cultural, structural, and cognitive resistances on the other, requires a great deal of courage and a capacity for self-reflection.
Lack of gender diversity in leadership teams? Feeling that candidates with such a level of qualification or experience do not exist? That it's impossible to recruit a woman in a technical field or in a leadership position? Discover Artemia's magic formula!
Between innovation and fear of change, what role does boldness play in recruitment processes?
During recruitment processes, many organizations express their fear of not finding a candidate up to their expectations. They often acknowledge the search for a 'unicorn,' yet find it challenging to let go of certain criteria that are not essential skills for the position.
While progress towards gender diversity in the professional world is slow, there is currently a growing notion that women are inevitably favored, to the detriment of men. Where does this gap between reality and perception come from?
Some photos are particularly telling about existing power dynamics. Take COP 27, for example, its opening photo: 110 heads of state or government, 11 women.