When it comes to recruitment or career progression, there's a consensus that skills are paramount. The goal is to identify, choose, and promote the most capable individuals for the position. Up to this point, you might say it sounds normal, logical, and even reassuring. It's only natural that people are chosen based on factual, objective, and indisputable criteria. However, that's where it gets tricky...
Faced with a shortage of skilled labor and the numerous retirements on the horizon, candidates are in a favorable position and are comparing opportunities. Being an attractive employer is not something improvised!
Women executives, often under scrutiny, frequently exhaust themselves trying to prove their legitimacy and are at a higher risk of burnout than men.
What practical steps can be taken to promote inclusion and make sure toxic and sexist behaviours are no longer tolerated?
In the radio show Forum on the RTS, about the challenges faced by working mothers : Eglantine Jamet, co-founder of Artemia, debates with Lucie Rochat, President of UDC women and Valérie Piller Carrard, socialist Fribourg MP and President of Pro Familia.
Artemia comments the new legal measures about equal pay in Le Temps.
Artemia's analysis about quotas and impactful measures for more diversity.
Artemia about the concept of inclusive leadership in Forbes.